Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
A claim of forged Chartered Accountant certificates in a non-resident to resident share transfer failed because the appellant relied only on an uncorroborated denial and produced no independent proof of forgery. The Tribunal noted that the required documents had been routed through the authorised dealer bank, the transaction had been reported, and other material, including a later Chartered Accountant certificate and an invoice linked to the certificates, supported the respondents' version. In the absence of a police complaint or other corroborative evidence, mere suspicion was insufficient to displace the documentary record or establish contravention of the applicable FEMA and RBI transfer and pricing requirements. The appeal was dismissed and the respondents' exoneration was upheld.
A claim of forged Chartered Accountant certificates in a non-resident to resident share transfer failed because the appellant relied only on an uncorroborated denial and produced no independent proof of forgery. The Tribunal noted that the required documents had been routed through the authorised dealer bank, the transaction had been reported, and other material, including a later Chartered Accountant certificate and an invoice linked to the certificates, supported the respondents' version. In the absence of a police complaint or other corroborative evidence, mere suspicion was insufficient to displace the documentary record or establish contravention of the applicable FEMA and RBI transfer and pricing requirements. The appeal was dismissed and the respondents' exoneration was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
