Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cargo handling services relating to agricultural produce were held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 10/2002-ST, because the invoices showed handling of items such as onion, grapes and spices and the Revenue produced no contrary corroborative evidence; the demand on that component was set aside. The Tribunal also sustained the demand for renting of immovable property service, as the assessee had itself accepted that part of the receipts and did not contest liability on that category. Considering subsequent registration for the taxable services, the Tribunal took a lenient view and waived the penalty under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Cargo handling services relating to agricultural produce were held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 10/2002-ST, because the invoices showed handling of items such as onion, grapes and spices and the Revenue produced no contrary corroborative evidence; the demand on that component was set aside. The Tribunal also sustained the demand for renting of immovable property service, as the assessee had itself accepted that part of the receipts and did not contest liability on that category. Considering subsequent registration for the taxable services, the Tribunal took a lenient view and waived the penalty under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.