Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cargo handling services relating to agricultural produce were held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 10/2002-ST, because the invoices showed handling of items such as onion, grapes and spices and the Revenue produced no contrary corroborative evidence; the demand on that component was set aside. The Tribunal also sustained the demand for renting of immovable property service, as the assessee had itself accepted that part of the receipts and did not contest liability on that category. Considering subsequent registration for the taxable services, the Tribunal took a lenient view and waived the penalty under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Cargo handling services relating to agricultural produce were held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 10/2002-ST, because the invoices showed handling of items such as onion, grapes and spices and the Revenue produced no contrary corroborative evidence; the demand on that component was set aside. The Tribunal also sustained the demand for renting of immovable property service, as the assessee had itself accepted that part of the receipts and did not contest liability on that category. Considering subsequent registration for the taxable services, the Tribunal took a lenient view and waived the penalty under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.