Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
A foreign arbitral award was held enforceable in India because the payment directed by the award was treated as a current account transaction under FEMA and the Foreign Exchange Management (Current Account Transaction) Rules, 2000. The RBI's affidavit clarified that payment of compensatory damages did not require prior approval or permission, and that the award did not involve transfer of shares. On that basis, the Court found no legal impediment to enforcement and directed that execution proceedings continue expeditiously, with nothing further remaining to be adjudicated.
A foreign arbitral award was held enforceable in India because the payment directed by the award was treated as a current account transaction under FEMA and the Foreign Exchange Management (Current Account Transaction) Rules, 2000. The RBI's affidavit clarified that payment of compensatory damages did not require prior approval or permission, and that the award did not involve transfer of shares. On that basis, the Court found no legal impediment to enforcement and directed that execution proceedings continue expeditiously, with nothing further remaining to be adjudicated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
