Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Once a resolution plan is approved under Section 31 of the IBC, claims not forming part of the plan, including prior-period statutory dues, stand extinguished and cannot be enforced against the corporate debtor. Applying the Supreme Court rulings in Satish Kumar Gupta and Ghanashyam Mishra, the HC held that the approved plan bound all stakeholders, including Government authorities, so pre-CIRP income-tax demands could not be adjusted against refund amounts. The impugned adjustment of refunds for the relevant assessment years was therefore quashed as unsustainable in law.
Once a resolution plan is approved under Section 31 of the IBC, claims not forming part of the plan, including prior-period statutory dues, stand extinguished and cannot be enforced against the corporate debtor. Applying the Supreme Court rulings in Satish Kumar Gupta and Ghanashyam Mishra, the HC held that the approved plan bound all stakeholders, including Government authorities, so pre-CIRP income-tax demands could not be adjusted against refund amounts. The impugned adjustment of refunds for the relevant assessment years was therefore quashed as unsustainable in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
