Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Once a resolution plan is approved under Section 31 of the IBC, claims not forming part of the plan, including prior-period statutory dues, stand extinguished and cannot be enforced against the corporate debtor. Applying the Supreme Court rulings in Satish Kumar Gupta and Ghanashyam Mishra, the HC held that the approved plan bound all stakeholders, including Government authorities, so pre-CIRP income-tax demands could not be adjusted against refund amounts. The impugned adjustment of refunds for the relevant assessment years was therefore quashed as unsustainable in law.
Once a resolution plan is approved under Section 31 of the IBC, claims not forming part of the plan, including prior-period statutory dues, stand extinguished and cannot be enforced against the corporate debtor. Applying the Supreme Court rulings in Satish Kumar Gupta and Ghanashyam Mishra, the HC held that the approved plan bound all stakeholders, including Government authorities, so pre-CIRP income-tax demands could not be adjusted against refund amounts. The impugned adjustment of refunds for the relevant assessment years was therefore quashed as unsustainable in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
