Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cash received as sale consideration on registration of immovable property deeds was held outside the mischief of section 269SS, because the provision was applied to advances in property transactions and not to completed transfer consideration duly reflected in registered documents. On that footing, penalty under section 271D could not be sustained. The Tribunal also held that valid initiation of penalty required recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer in the assessment or other proceedings, and no such satisfaction was shown on the record. The penalty was therefore quashed and deleted.
Cash received as sale consideration on registration of immovable property deeds was held outside the mischief of section 269SS, because the provision was applied to advances in property transactions and not to completed transfer consideration duly reflected in registered documents. On that footing, penalty under section 271D could not be sustained. The Tribunal also held that valid initiation of penalty required recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer in the assessment or other proceedings, and no such satisfaction was shown on the record. The penalty was therefore quashed and deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.