Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96407 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 194-IA applies transferee-wise, so the threshold for TDS on purchase of immovable property must be examined with reference to each joint transferee's share of consideration. Where an assessee's individual share is below the statutory limit, tax deduction cannot be insisted on merely because the total consideration under a single sale deed exceeds that limit. The order treating the assessee as in default under section 200A, and the appellate order sustaining it, were therefore unsustainable and the demand was set aside.
Section 194-IA applies transferee-wise, so the threshold for TDS on purchase of immovable property must be examined with reference to each joint transferee's share of consideration. Where an assessee's individual share is below the statutory limit, tax deduction cannot be insisted on merely because the total consideration under a single sale deed exceeds that limit. The order treating the assessee as in default under section 200A, and the appellate order sustaining it, were therefore unsustainable and the demand was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.