Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal held that the interest on overdue receivables from associated enterprises could not be benchmarked at LIBOR plus 450 basis points because no justification was given for that rate, and directed recomputation at LIBOR plus 200 basis points. The ESOP-cost dispute was treated as infructuous since no transfer pricing adjustment survived in the ITeS segment. On CSR donations, it held that contributions made to trusts eligible under section 80G were not barred merely because they formed part of CSR expenditure, and directed allowance of the deduction where the assessee had not claimed section 37 relief. Interest under sections 234A and 234C was left to be recomputed in accordance with law.
The Tribunal held that the interest on overdue receivables from associated enterprises could not be benchmarked at LIBOR plus 450 basis points because no justification was given for that rate, and directed recomputation at LIBOR plus 200 basis points. The ESOP-cost dispute was treated as infructuous since no transfer pricing adjustment survived in the ITeS segment. On CSR donations, it held that contributions made to trusts eligible under section 80G were not barred merely because they formed part of CSR expenditure, and directed allowance of the deduction where the assessee had not claimed section 37 relief. Interest under sections 234A and 234C was left to be recomputed in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.