Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
A High Court held that supply of solar power generating systems under the relevant notifications is governed by the 70:30 deemed valuation mechanism, under which 70% of the gross consideration is treated as goods taxable at 5% and 30% as services taxable at 18%. It rejected the revenue's contention that separate invoices for goods and services excluded the supply from this treatment, finding that the notifications contemplate such composite supplies and that contractual supply could not be displaced by invoicing alone. The assessment was also unsustainable because no separate valuation of goods and services had been undertaken before taxing the entire turnover at 18%. The differential levy was set aside.
A High Court held that supply of solar power generating systems under the relevant notifications is governed by the 70:30 deemed valuation mechanism, under which 70% of the gross consideration is treated as goods taxable at 5% and 30% as services taxable at 18%. It rejected the revenue's contention that separate invoices for goods and services excluded the supply from this treatment, finding that the notifications contemplate such composite supplies and that contractual supply could not be displaced by invoicing alone. The assessment was also unsustainable because no separate valuation of goods and services had been undertaken before taxing the entire turnover at 18%. The differential levy was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
