Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5561 to 5580 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed delay in filing a GST appeal and held that, although the Appellate Authority remains bound by the limitation under the CGST/RGST Act, the explanation showed circumstances beyond the petitioner's control. It found that denying adjudication on merits in such circumstances would cause grave prejudice, so the delay was condoned and the appellate remedy was directed to be entertained on merits. The challenge to the validity of the notifications was not pressed and was left open.
The High Court addressed delay in filing a GST appeal and held that, although the Appellate Authority remains bound by the limitation under the CGST/RGST Act, the explanation showed circumstances beyond the petitioner's control. It found that denying adjudication on merits in such circumstances would cause grave prejudice, so the delay was condoned and the appellate remedy was directed to be entertained on merits. The challenge to the validity of the notifications was not pressed and was left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
