Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court addressed delay in filing a GST appeal and held that, although the Appellate Authority remains bound by the limitation under the CGST/RGST Act, the explanation showed circumstances beyond the petitioner's control. It found that denying adjudication on merits in such circumstances would cause grave prejudice, so the delay was condoned and the appellate remedy was directed to be entertained on merits. The challenge to the validity of the notifications was not pressed and was left open.
The High Court addressed delay in filing a GST appeal and held that, although the Appellate Authority remains bound by the limitation under the CGST/RGST Act, the explanation showed circumstances beyond the petitioner's control. It found that denying adjudication on merits in such circumstances would cause grave prejudice, so the delay was condoned and the appellate remedy was directed to be entertained on merits. The challenge to the validity of the notifications was not pressed and was left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
