Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cancellation of GST registration based on alleged violation of Section 16 read with Rule 21(e) was not entertained in writ jurisdiction because the cancellation order recorded reasons and the petitioner had an efficacious statutory remedy of revocation under Rule 23 read with Section 30 within the prescribed period. The challenge to the e-mail blocking input tax credit was also declined, as the blockage was linked to allegations of fake or non-existent firms and the investigation was still continuing; judicial restraint was therefore warranted. The writ petition was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the available statutory remedy and other remedies in accordance with law.
Cancellation of GST registration based on alleged violation of Section 16 read with Rule 21(e) was not entertained in writ jurisdiction because the cancellation order recorded reasons and the petitioner had an efficacious statutory remedy of revocation under Rule 23 read with Section 30 within the prescribed period. The challenge to the e-mail blocking input tax credit was also declined, as the blockage was linked to allegations of fake or non-existent firms and the investigation was still continuing; judicial restraint was therefore warranted. The writ petition was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the available statutory remedy and other remedies in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
