Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Cancellation of GST registration based on alleged violation of Section 16 read with Rule 21(e) was not entertained in writ jurisdiction because the cancellation order recorded reasons and the petitioner had an efficacious statutory remedy of revocation under Rule 23 read with Section 30 within the prescribed period. The challenge to the e-mail blocking input tax credit was also declined, as the blockage was linked to allegations of fake or non-existent firms and the investigation was still continuing; judicial restraint was therefore warranted. The writ petition was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the available statutory remedy and other remedies in accordance with law.
Cancellation of GST registration based on alleged violation of Section 16 read with Rule 21(e) was not entertained in writ jurisdiction because the cancellation order recorded reasons and the petitioner had an efficacious statutory remedy of revocation under Rule 23 read with Section 30 within the prescribed period. The challenge to the e-mail blocking input tax credit was also declined, as the blockage was linked to allegations of fake or non-existent firms and the investigation was still continuing; judicial restraint was therefore warranted. The writ petition was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the available statutory remedy and other remedies in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
