Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5561 to 5580 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of transitional credit could not be sustained where the appellate authority ignored material documentary evidence placed by the claimant, including a certificate and receipt evidencing payment of service tax into the Government treasury. That non-consideration amounted to clear non-application of mind and rendered the appellate order unsustainable; the original order, which rested on the same foundation, also failed. The HC therefore quashed both orders and remanded the matter for de novo consideration by a reasoned speaking order after granting personal hearing, leaving all contentions open.
Denial of transitional credit could not be sustained where the appellate authority ignored material documentary evidence placed by the claimant, including a certificate and receipt evidencing payment of service tax into the Government treasury. That non-consideration amounted to clear non-application of mind and rendered the appellate order unsustainable; the original order, which rested on the same foundation, also failed. The HC therefore quashed both orders and remanded the matter for de novo consideration by a reasoned speaking order after granting personal hearing, leaving all contentions open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.