Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1181 to 1200 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A show cause notice and retrospective cancellation of GST registration were vitiated because the notice gave no meaningful reasons, did not annex the supporting material it relied on, and failed to disclose that retrospective cancellation was proposed. The Court applied the principle of natural justice that the person affected must be clearly put to notice of the intended action and the material relied upon; absence of such disclosure invalidates the proceedings. The impugned notice and cancellation order were quashed, with liberty to the authorities to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
A show cause notice and retrospective cancellation of GST registration were vitiated because the notice gave no meaningful reasons, did not annex the supporting material it relied on, and failed to disclose that retrospective cancellation was proposed. The Court applied the principle of natural justice that the person affected must be clearly put to notice of the intended action and the material relied upon; absence of such disclosure invalidates the proceedings. The impugned notice and cancellation order were quashed, with liberty to the authorities to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.