Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Anticipatory bail in a Customs investigation was granted because adjudicatory proceedings had already commenced, a show cause notice had been issued, and the applicant was participating in that process. The court also noted the absence of criminal antecedents, no alleged breach during a prolonged ad-interim protection period, and that the matter largely turned on documentary evidence available to the investigating agency. On that basis, it held that the applicant's presence could be secured through conditions and that custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was allowed subject to conditions ensuring attendance and cooperation with the investigation.
Anticipatory bail in a Customs investigation was granted because adjudicatory proceedings had already commenced, a show cause notice had been issued, and the applicant was participating in that process. The court also noted the absence of criminal antecedents, no alleged breach during a prolonged ad-interim protection period, and that the matter largely turned on documentary evidence available to the investigating agency. On that basis, it held that the applicant's presence could be secured through conditions and that custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Bail was allowed subject to conditions ensuring attendance and cooperation with the investigation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.