Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
An NCLAT decision held that a post-reservation application seeking leave to deposit the entire claimed debt could not be ignored when it had already been taken on record, notice had been issued, and it was fixed for later consideration. Because the admission of the section 7 insolvency petition was made without addressing that pending application and the proposed full deposit, the admission order was set aside as unsustainable. The Tribunal also held that section 12A did not apply, since there was no settlement between the parties; the matter involved only a unilateral offer by the corporate debtor to deposit the claimed amount. The appeal was allowed, and payment was directed subject to the debtor's entitlement being finally determined in the pending recovery proceedings.
An NCLAT decision held that a post-reservation application seeking leave to deposit the entire claimed debt could not be ignored when it had already been taken on record, notice had been issued, and it was fixed for later consideration. Because the admission of the section 7 insolvency petition was made without addressing that pending application and the proposed full deposit, the admission order was set aside as unsustainable. The Tribunal also held that section 12A did not apply, since there was no settlement between the parties; the matter involved only a unilateral offer by the corporate debtor to deposit the claimed amount. The appeal was allowed, and payment was directed subject to the debtor's entitlement being finally determined in the pending recovery proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
