Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act was upheld as a cumulative condition for input tax credit, and the purchaser must prove that tax charged on the supply was actually paid to the Government. The Court held that clauses (a) to (d) of Section 16(2) must be read conjointly, that ITC is a statutory concession rather than a vested right, and that non-payment by the supplier cannot be ignored merely because the recipient has the invoice and goods or services. Reading down was refused because the provision is clear, fits the GST scheme, and preserves revenue integrity against fraudulent transactions.
Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act was upheld as a cumulative condition for input tax credit, and the purchaser must prove that tax charged on the supply was actually paid to the Government. The Court held that clauses (a) to (d) of Section 16(2) must be read conjointly, that ITC is a statutory concession rather than a vested right, and that non-payment by the supplier cannot be ignored merely because the recipient has the invoice and goods or services. Reading down was refused because the provision is clear, fits the GST scheme, and preserves revenue integrity against fraudulent transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
