Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Absence of a Document Identification Number rendered the assessment orders invalid, as the High Court followed its earlier view that DIN is an inherent requirement for such orders. Although delay in filing the writ petitions was objected to on the basis of portal service, the Court entertained the delayed petitions in light of practical difficulties under the online GST regime, subject to deposit of 20% of the disputed tax. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh assessment after granting due opportunity of hearing, with adjustment of amounts already paid or recovered and exclusion of the intervening period for limitation.
Absence of a Document Identification Number rendered the assessment orders invalid, as the High Court followed its earlier view that DIN is an inherent requirement for such orders. Although delay in filing the writ petitions was objected to on the basis of portal service, the Court entertained the delayed petitions in light of practical difficulties under the online GST regime, subject to deposit of 20% of the disputed tax. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh assessment after granting due opportunity of hearing, with adjustment of amounts already paid or recovered and exclusion of the intervening period for limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
