Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interim protection granted in writ proceedings against criminal proceedings under the CGST Act was confined to the criminal process and did not restrain the Revenue from pursuing adjudicatory action under Sections 73 or 74. The HC noted that the challenged order was only an interim bail order, that custody was not shown to be required for further investigation, and that the connected writ orders stayed criminal proceedings alone. On that basis, the Court declined to interfere and dismissed the appeal, leaving open the question of maintainability of the writ petition in light of the Magistrate's earlier refusal of bail.
Interim protection granted in writ proceedings against criminal proceedings under the CGST Act was confined to the criminal process and did not restrain the Revenue from pursuing adjudicatory action under Sections 73 or 74. The HC noted that the challenged order was only an interim bail order, that custody was not shown to be required for further investigation, and that the connected writ orders stayed criminal proceedings alone. On that basis, the Court declined to interfere and dismissed the appeal, leaving open the question of maintainability of the writ petition in light of the Magistrate's earlier refusal of bail.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.