Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Allegations that the taxpayers failed to produce documents showing inward movement of goods, and thus wrongly availed and passed on input tax credit, led to proceedings under the GST penalty provisions. The Court noted the grievance that the replies had not been considered in the impugned order, raising a natural justice concern. Recording the taxpayers' undertaking to deposit 10% of the disputed tax, the Court remitted the matters for fresh adjudication on merits, directed filing of replies with supporting documents, and ordered that the bank attachment be lifted on compliance.
Allegations that the taxpayers failed to produce documents showing inward movement of goods, and thus wrongly availed and passed on input tax credit, led to proceedings under the GST penalty provisions. The Court noted the grievance that the replies had not been considered in the impugned order, raising a natural justice concern. Recording the taxpayers' undertaking to deposit 10% of the disputed tax, the Court remitted the matters for fresh adjudication on merits, directed filing of replies with supporting documents, and ordered that the bank attachment be lifted on compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
