Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Allegations that the taxpayers failed to produce documents showing inward movement of goods, and thus wrongly availed and passed on input tax credit, led to proceedings under the GST penalty provisions. The Court noted the grievance that the replies had not been considered in the impugned order, raising a natural justice concern. Recording the taxpayers' undertaking to deposit 10% of the disputed tax, the Court remitted the matters for fresh adjudication on merits, directed filing of replies with supporting documents, and ordered that the bank attachment be lifted on compliance.
Allegations that the taxpayers failed to produce documents showing inward movement of goods, and thus wrongly availed and passed on input tax credit, led to proceedings under the GST penalty provisions. The Court noted the grievance that the replies had not been considered in the impugned order, raising a natural justice concern. Recording the taxpayers' undertaking to deposit 10% of the disputed tax, the Court remitted the matters for fresh adjudication on merits, directed filing of replies with supporting documents, and ordered that the bank attachment be lifted on compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
