Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Academic coaching for students of Standards 5 to 12 was treated as supplementary tuition, not as services supplied by an educational institution. The Authority found that the activity did not amount to pre-school education, education up to higher secondary level or equivalent, curriculum-based education leading to a recognised qualification, or approved vocational education. As the applicant did not fall within the definition of "educational institution" under the exemption notification, Entry 66 exemption was unavailable. The service was therefore classified as commercial training and coaching under SAC 999293 and held taxable at 18% GST.
Academic coaching for students of Standards 5 to 12 was treated as supplementary tuition, not as services supplied by an educational institution. The Authority found that the activity did not amount to pre-school education, education up to higher secondary level or equivalent, curriculum-based education leading to a recognised qualification, or approved vocational education. As the applicant did not fall within the definition of "educational institution" under the exemption notification, Entry 66 exemption was unavailable. The service was therefore classified as commercial training and coaching under SAC 999293 and held taxable at 18% GST.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
