Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
An appellate authority dealing with one assessment year cannot issue directions affecting reopening for earlier years, because its jurisdiction is confined to the year under appeal. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) went beyond the scope of the appeal by directing reopening of earlier assessment years, so that direction was beyond competence and had to be expunged. The separate validity of reopening under section 150 was left unexamined, as the matter was resolved on lack of appellate jurisdiction alone.
An appellate authority dealing with one assessment year cannot issue directions affecting reopening for earlier years, because its jurisdiction is confined to the year under appeal. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) went beyond the scope of the appeal by directing reopening of earlier assessment years, so that direction was beyond competence and had to be expunged. The separate validity of reopening under section 150 was left unexamined, as the matter was resolved on lack of appellate jurisdiction alone.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.