Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1461 to 1480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In transfer pricing proceedings concerning interest on rupee-denominated non-convertible debentures issued to an associated enterprise, the ITAT upheld 10% as the arm's length rate because the same instruments had already been examined in the first year and the TPO had accepted that rate using SBI PLR as the benchmark for rupee-denominated instruments. The Tribunal also noted that payment and redemption were in Indian currency, supporting the CIT(A)'s acceptance of the rate. Revenue's challenge to deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment was rejected. The Tribunal further corrected the interest quantum to be adopted for the year, directing use of Rs. 8,27,24,756 as the proper amount.
In transfer pricing proceedings concerning interest on rupee-denominated non-convertible debentures issued to an associated enterprise, the ITAT upheld 10% as the arm's length rate because the same instruments had already been examined in the first year and the TPO had accepted that rate using SBI PLR as the benchmark for rupee-denominated instruments. The Tribunal also noted that payment and redemption were in Indian currency, supporting the CIT(A)'s acceptance of the rate. Revenue's challenge to deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment was rejected. The Tribunal further corrected the interest quantum to be adopted for the year, directing use of Rs. 8,27,24,756 as the proper amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
