Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
In transfer pricing proceedings concerning interest on rupee-denominated non-convertible debentures issued to an associated enterprise, the ITAT upheld 10% as the arm's length rate because the same instruments had already been examined in the first year and the TPO had accepted that rate using SBI PLR as the benchmark for rupee-denominated instruments. The Tribunal also noted that payment and redemption were in Indian currency, supporting the CIT(A)'s acceptance of the rate. Revenue's challenge to deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment was rejected. The Tribunal further corrected the interest quantum to be adopted for the year, directing use of Rs. 8,27,24,756 as the proper amount.
In transfer pricing proceedings concerning interest on rupee-denominated non-convertible debentures issued to an associated enterprise, the ITAT upheld 10% as the arm's length rate because the same instruments had already been examined in the first year and the TPO had accepted that rate using SBI PLR as the benchmark for rupee-denominated instruments. The Tribunal also noted that payment and redemption were in Indian currency, supporting the CIT(A)'s acceptance of the rate. Revenue's challenge to deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment was rejected. The Tribunal further corrected the interest quantum to be adopted for the year, directing use of Rs. 8,27,24,756 as the proper amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
