Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
In transfer pricing proceedings concerning interest on rupee-denominated non-convertible debentures issued to an associated enterprise, the ITAT upheld 10% as the arm's length rate because the same instruments had already been examined in the first year and the TPO had accepted that rate using SBI PLR as the benchmark for rupee-denominated instruments. The Tribunal also noted that payment and redemption were in Indian currency, supporting the CIT(A)'s acceptance of the rate. Revenue's challenge to deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment was rejected. The Tribunal further corrected the interest quantum to be adopted for the year, directing use of Rs. 8,27,24,756 as the proper amount.
In transfer pricing proceedings concerning interest on rupee-denominated non-convertible debentures issued to an associated enterprise, the ITAT upheld 10% as the arm's length rate because the same instruments had already been examined in the first year and the TPO had accepted that rate using SBI PLR as the benchmark for rupee-denominated instruments. The Tribunal also noted that payment and redemption were in Indian currency, supporting the CIT(A)'s acceptance of the rate. Revenue's challenge to deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment was rejected. The Tribunal further corrected the interest quantum to be adopted for the year, directing use of Rs. 8,27,24,756 as the proper amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
