Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Income declared under the IDS-2016 became chargeable to tax under the Income-tax Act in the previous year in which the declaration was made when the declarant failed to pay the tax, surcharge and penalty within the prescribed time. As the declaration was filed on 28.09.2016, the Tribunal held that the Revenue could not reopen and assess that amount in AY 2013-14. The reassessment and corresponding addition for that year were therefore unsustainable in law, and the addition was deleted.
Income declared under the IDS-2016 became chargeable to tax under the Income-tax Act in the previous year in which the declaration was made when the declarant failed to pay the tax, surcharge and penalty within the prescribed time. As the declaration was filed on 28.09.2016, the Tribunal held that the Revenue could not reopen and assess that amount in AY 2013-14. The reassessment and corresponding addition for that year were therefore unsustainable in law, and the addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
