Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A reassessment notice issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year was held invalid because approval was taken from the wrong authority under section 151, so the reassessment for AY 2017-18 was quashed. Additions for alleged unexplained money, accommodation entries, commission, and suppressed gross profit were deleted because the Revenue relied on assumptions and dumb documents, while the assessee produced invoices, ledgers, stock records, GST material, and bank evidence and no corroborative material showed receipt of unaccounted cash. The Tribunal also held that valuation of unquoted shares under the assessee's chosen DCF method could not be replaced by the Assessing Officer's preferred method. For AY 2023-24, one cash issue was remanded for reconciliation, and on alleged unrecorded cash sales only the profit element was directed to be taxed.
A reassessment notice issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year was held invalid because approval was taken from the wrong authority under section 151, so the reassessment for AY 2017-18 was quashed. Additions for alleged unexplained money, accommodation entries, commission, and suppressed gross profit were deleted because the Revenue relied on assumptions and dumb documents, while the assessee produced invoices, ledgers, stock records, GST material, and bank evidence and no corroborative material showed receipt of unaccounted cash. The Tribunal also held that valuation of unquoted shares under the assessee's chosen DCF method could not be replaced by the Assessing Officer's preferred method. For AY 2023-24, one cash issue was remanded for reconciliation, and on alleged unrecorded cash sales only the profit element was directed to be taxed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
