Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A reassessment notice issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year was held invalid because approval was taken from the wrong authority under section 151, so the reassessment for AY 2017-18 was quashed. Additions for alleged unexplained money, accommodation entries, commission, and suppressed gross profit were deleted because the Revenue relied on assumptions and dumb documents, while the assessee produced invoices, ledgers, stock records, GST material, and bank evidence and no corroborative material showed receipt of unaccounted cash. The Tribunal also held that valuation of unquoted shares under the assessee's chosen DCF method could not be replaced by the Assessing Officer's preferred method. For AY 2023-24, one cash issue was remanded for reconciliation, and on alleged unrecorded cash sales only the profit element was directed to be taxed.
A reassessment notice issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year was held invalid because approval was taken from the wrong authority under section 151, so the reassessment for AY 2017-18 was quashed. Additions for alleged unexplained money, accommodation entries, commission, and suppressed gross profit were deleted because the Revenue relied on assumptions and dumb documents, while the assessee produced invoices, ledgers, stock records, GST material, and bank evidence and no corroborative material showed receipt of unaccounted cash. The Tribunal also held that valuation of unquoted shares under the assessee's chosen DCF method could not be replaced by the Assessing Officer's preferred method. For AY 2023-24, one cash issue was remanded for reconciliation, and on alleged unrecorded cash sales only the profit element was directed to be taxed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
