Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
A reassessment notice issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year was held invalid because approval was taken from the wrong authority under section 151, so the reassessment for AY 2017-18 was quashed. Additions for alleged unexplained money, accommodation entries, commission, and suppressed gross profit were deleted because the Revenue relied on assumptions and dumb documents, while the assessee produced invoices, ledgers, stock records, GST material, and bank evidence and no corroborative material showed receipt of unaccounted cash. The Tribunal also held that valuation of unquoted shares under the assessee's chosen DCF method could not be replaced by the Assessing Officer's preferred method. For AY 2023-24, one cash issue was remanded for reconciliation, and on alleged unrecorded cash sales only the profit element was directed to be taxed.
A reassessment notice issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year was held invalid because approval was taken from the wrong authority under section 151, so the reassessment for AY 2017-18 was quashed. Additions for alleged unexplained money, accommodation entries, commission, and suppressed gross profit were deleted because the Revenue relied on assumptions and dumb documents, while the assessee produced invoices, ledgers, stock records, GST material, and bank evidence and no corroborative material showed receipt of unaccounted cash. The Tribunal also held that valuation of unquoted shares under the assessee's chosen DCF method could not be replaced by the Assessing Officer's preferred method. For AY 2023-24, one cash issue was remanded for reconciliation, and on alleged unrecorded cash sales only the profit element was directed to be taxed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
