Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 12AB(4) cancellation for specified violation is stated to operate prospectively from 01.04.2022, so a cancellation based on alleged breaches from FY 2014-15 was treated as retrospective application not permitted by the statute. The text further notes that reliance on section 12AA after its omission from 01.04.2021 was inconsistent with the statutory framework, and jurisdiction under section 12AB(4) could not arise without a specified violation after 01.04.2022. On merits, the alleged expenses were said to support religious and charitable objects, while valuation issues, accounting lapses and procedural defects did not establish non-genuineness or false information. The cancellation was therefore described as unsustainable.
Section 12AB(4) cancellation for specified violation is stated to operate prospectively from 01.04.2022, so a cancellation based on alleged breaches from FY 2014-15 was treated as retrospective application not permitted by the statute. The text further notes that reliance on section 12AA after its omission from 01.04.2021 was inconsistent with the statutory framework, and jurisdiction under section 12AB(4) could not arise without a specified violation after 01.04.2022. On merits, the alleged expenses were said to support religious and charitable objects, while valuation issues, accounting lapses and procedural defects did not establish non-genuineness or false information. The cancellation was therefore described as unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
