Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 12AB(4) cancellation for specified violation is stated to operate prospectively from 01.04.2022, so a cancellation based on alleged breaches from FY 2014-15 was treated as retrospective application not permitted by the statute. The text further notes that reliance on section 12AA after its omission from 01.04.2021 was inconsistent with the statutory framework, and jurisdiction under section 12AB(4) could not arise without a specified violation after 01.04.2022. On merits, the alleged expenses were said to support religious and charitable objects, while valuation issues, accounting lapses and procedural defects did not establish non-genuineness or false information. The cancellation was therefore described as unsustainable.
Section 12AB(4) cancellation for specified violation is stated to operate prospectively from 01.04.2022, so a cancellation based on alleged breaches from FY 2014-15 was treated as retrospective application not permitted by the statute. The text further notes that reliance on section 12AA after its omission from 01.04.2021 was inconsistent with the statutory framework, and jurisdiction under section 12AB(4) could not arise without a specified violation after 01.04.2022. On merits, the alleged expenses were said to support religious and charitable objects, while valuation issues, accounting lapses and procedural defects did not establish non-genuineness or false information. The cancellation was therefore described as unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
