Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1461 to 1480 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Project Falcon material, standing alone, could not justify an addition under section 68 where the assessee had already recorded the option-trading profit in its profit and loss account, the trade data showed both gains and losses, and there was no direct assessee-specific evidence of a manipulative reversal-trade arrangement. The Tribunal held that the proposed addition would also amount to double taxation, so the deletion of the section 68 addition and the related commission disallowance under section 69C was upheld. On the alleged accommodation loan, the assessee discharged the burden by producing cheque payment, books, confirmations, bank statements and repayment evidence, while the lender's financials showed creditworthiness; in the absence of contrary inquiry or direct linkage, the section 68 addition was unsustainable and its deletion was affirmed.
Project Falcon material, standing alone, could not justify an addition under section 68 where the assessee had already recorded the option-trading profit in its profit and loss account, the trade data showed both gains and losses, and there was no direct assessee-specific evidence of a manipulative reversal-trade arrangement. The Tribunal held that the proposed addition would also amount to double taxation, so the deletion of the section 68 addition and the related commission disallowance under section 69C was upheld. On the alleged accommodation loan, the assessee discharged the burden by producing cheque payment, books, confirmations, bank statements and repayment evidence, while the lender's financials showed creditworthiness; in the absence of contrary inquiry or direct linkage, the section 68 addition was unsustainable and its deletion was affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.