Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Under Rule 10B, reasonably accurate adjustments may be made in TNMM where a difference materially distorts net profit margin; depreciation on in-house software was treated as requiring adjustment because it substantially affected the assessee's PLI and the benchmarking exercise, and recomputation was directed. The Tribunal also accepted an upper turnover filter for comparability, holding that companies with vastly higher turnover than the assessee were not meaningfully comparable and must be excluded. On functional dissimilarity, the Tribunal found the existing record insufficient for a final finding because relevant submissions had not been properly examined, and remitted the issue to the TPO for fresh consideration.
Under Rule 10B, reasonably accurate adjustments may be made in TNMM where a difference materially distorts net profit margin; depreciation on in-house software was treated as requiring adjustment because it substantially affected the assessee's PLI and the benchmarking exercise, and recomputation was directed. The Tribunal also accepted an upper turnover filter for comparability, holding that companies with vastly higher turnover than the assessee were not meaningfully comparable and must be excluded. On functional dissimilarity, the Tribunal found the existing record insufficient for a final finding because relevant submissions had not been properly examined, and remitted the issue to the TPO for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
