Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Under Rule 10B, reasonably accurate adjustments may be made in TNMM where a difference materially distorts net profit margin; depreciation on in-house software was treated as requiring adjustment because it substantially affected the assessee's PLI and the benchmarking exercise, and recomputation was directed. The Tribunal also accepted an upper turnover filter for comparability, holding that companies with vastly higher turnover than the assessee were not meaningfully comparable and must be excluded. On functional dissimilarity, the Tribunal found the existing record insufficient for a final finding because relevant submissions had not been properly examined, and remitted the issue to the TPO for fresh consideration.
Under Rule 10B, reasonably accurate adjustments may be made in TNMM where a difference materially distorts net profit margin; depreciation on in-house software was treated as requiring adjustment because it substantially affected the assessee's PLI and the benchmarking exercise, and recomputation was directed. The Tribunal also accepted an upper turnover filter for comparability, holding that companies with vastly higher turnover than the assessee were not meaningfully comparable and must be excluded. On functional dissimilarity, the Tribunal found the existing record insufficient for a final finding because relevant submissions had not been properly examined, and remitted the issue to the TPO for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
