Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1461 to 1480 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Business expenditure claims for shortages and quality cuts were sent back for fresh verification because the lower authorities had rejected them for want of complete supporting evidence, while the Tribunal found no corroboration for the assumption that the goods remained in closing stock and noted that additional material had not yet been examined. The transfer pricing adjustment under the CUP method was also remanded because a disputed credit note appeared to involve only a clerical date error, and the revised arm's length computation with discounts and credit notes required verification. The omitted TDS credit was ordered to be granted because it had been acknowledged in the draft computation and was not denied by any DRP direction.
Business expenditure claims for shortages and quality cuts were sent back for fresh verification because the lower authorities had rejected them for want of complete supporting evidence, while the Tribunal found no corroboration for the assumption that the goods remained in closing stock and noted that additional material had not yet been examined. The transfer pricing adjustment under the CUP method was also remanded because a disputed credit note appeared to involve only a clerical date error, and the revised arm's length computation with discounts and credit notes required verification. The omitted TDS credit was ordered to be granted because it had been acknowledged in the draft computation and was not denied by any DRP direction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
