Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1201 to 1220 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A later company petition was barred by res judicata where it sought substantially the same reliefs on the same cause of action as an earlier petition, including challenge to board resolutions, restoration of position in the company and control over bank operations. The Appellate Tribunal held that the earlier orders had attained finality because they were carried through the appellate process and left undisturbed, and withdrawal of the civil appeal before the Supreme Court did not permit reopening the concluded dispute. The fresh proceeding was therefore an abuse of process and the company appeal was dismissed.
A later company petition was barred by res judicata where it sought substantially the same reliefs on the same cause of action as an earlier petition, including challenge to board resolutions, restoration of position in the company and control over bank operations. The Appellate Tribunal held that the earlier orders had attained finality because they were carried through the appellate process and left undisturbed, and withdrawal of the civil appeal before the Supreme Court did not permit reopening the concluded dispute. The fresh proceeding was therefore an abuse of process and the company appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
