Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A later company petition was barred by res judicata where it sought substantially the same reliefs on the same cause of action as an earlier petition, including challenge to board resolutions, restoration of position in the company and control over bank operations. The Appellate Tribunal held that the earlier orders had attained finality because they were carried through the appellate process and left undisturbed, and withdrawal of the civil appeal before the Supreme Court did not permit reopening the concluded dispute. The fresh proceeding was therefore an abuse of process and the company appeal was dismissed.
A later company petition was barred by res judicata where it sought substantially the same reliefs on the same cause of action as an earlier petition, including challenge to board resolutions, restoration of position in the company and control over bank operations. The Appellate Tribunal held that the earlier orders had attained finality because they were carried through the appellate process and left undisturbed, and withdrawal of the civil appeal before the Supreme Court did not permit reopening the concluded dispute. The fresh proceeding was therefore an abuse of process and the company appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
