Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A writ challenge to a notice initiating revision under Section 108 was held premature because no final revisional order had yet been passed. The High Court left open the petitioner's objections on jurisdiction and maintainability to be raised before the revisional authority and declined interference at the threshold. At the same time, it protected the petitioner by directing conditional release of the goods pending revision, subject to an additional deposit, filing of an affidavit undertaking to abide by the revisional order, and participation in the revisional proceedings. The writ petition was disposed of without examining the merits of the revision challenge.
A writ challenge to a notice initiating revision under Section 108 was held premature because no final revisional order had yet been passed. The High Court left open the petitioner's objections on jurisdiction and maintainability to be raised before the revisional authority and declined interference at the threshold. At the same time, it protected the petitioner by directing conditional release of the goods pending revision, subject to an additional deposit, filing of an affidavit undertaking to abide by the revisional order, and participation in the revisional proceedings. The writ petition was disposed of without examining the merits of the revision challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
