Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
Validity of an ex parte GST assessment order was not examined on merits. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, subject to the petitioner's compliance with the conditions relating to filing a reply and depositing 10% of the disputed tax in case of any shortfall in the amount already stated to have been paid. The operative effect is that the assessment was set aside from substantive consideration and the respondent must reconsider the matter after the stated procedural and pre-deposit requirements are met.
Validity of an ex parte GST assessment order was not examined on merits. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, subject to the petitioner's compliance with the conditions relating to filing a reply and depositing 10% of the disputed tax in case of any shortfall in the amount already stated to have been paid. The operative effect is that the assessment was set aside from substantive consideration and the respondent must reconsider the matter after the stated procedural and pre-deposit requirements are met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.