Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Validity of an ex parte GST assessment order was not examined on merits. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, subject to the petitioner's compliance with the conditions relating to filing a reply and depositing 10% of the disputed tax in case of any shortfall in the amount already stated to have been paid. The operative effect is that the assessment was set aside from substantive consideration and the respondent must reconsider the matter after the stated procedural and pre-deposit requirements are met.
Validity of an ex parte GST assessment order was not examined on merits. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, subject to the petitioner's compliance with the conditions relating to filing a reply and depositing 10% of the disputed tax in case of any shortfall in the amount already stated to have been paid. The operative effect is that the assessment was set aside from substantive consideration and the respondent must reconsider the matter after the stated procedural and pre-deposit requirements are met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
