Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Validity of an ex parte GST assessment order was not examined on merits. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, subject to the petitioner's compliance with the conditions relating to filing a reply and depositing 10% of the disputed tax in case of any shortfall in the amount already stated to have been paid. The operative effect is that the assessment was set aside from substantive consideration and the respondent must reconsider the matter after the stated procedural and pre-deposit requirements are met.
Validity of an ex parte GST assessment order was not examined on merits. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, subject to the petitioner's compliance with the conditions relating to filing a reply and depositing 10% of the disputed tax in case of any shortfall in the amount already stated to have been paid. The operative effect is that the assessment was set aside from substantive consideration and the respondent must reconsider the matter after the stated procedural and pre-deposit requirements are met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.