Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Admission of additional evidence in appeal does not dispense with Rule 46A(3) compliance merely because the appellate authority invokes section 250(4). Where documents are produced for the first time in appeal and relied upon, the Assessing Officer must be confronted with them and given an opportunity to verify and comment. The Tribunal distinguished appellate enquiry powers from the separate procedure for admitting additional evidence, and held that they cannot be conflated to bypass the mandatory opportunity to the Assessing Officer. The deletion of the section 68 addition was therefore set aside on this limited ground, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after a remand report.
Admission of additional evidence in appeal does not dispense with Rule 46A(3) compliance merely because the appellate authority invokes section 250(4). Where documents are produced for the first time in appeal and relied upon, the Assessing Officer must be confronted with them and given an opportunity to verify and comment. The Tribunal distinguished appellate enquiry powers from the separate procedure for admitting additional evidence, and held that they cannot be conflated to bypass the mandatory opportunity to the Assessing Officer. The deletion of the section 68 addition was therefore set aside on this limited ground, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after a remand report.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
