Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Cash received over and above the registered sale consideration on transfer of jointly owned immovable properties was treated as additional sale consideration, not unexplained money. Section 69A applies only where a person is found to be owner of unrecorded money and cannot satisfactorily explain its nature and source; here, the Assessing Officer had accepted the receipt as on-money from the buyers. Because the source was identified as part of the sale transaction, the amount could not be taxed as unexplained money merely because it was received in cash and omitted from the sale deed. The capital gains computation had to be recomputed in each co-owner's hands according to their share.
Cash received over and above the registered sale consideration on transfer of jointly owned immovable properties was treated as additional sale consideration, not unexplained money. Section 69A applies only where a person is found to be owner of unrecorded money and cannot satisfactorily explain its nature and source; here, the Assessing Officer had accepted the receipt as on-money from the buyers. Because the source was identified as part of the sale transaction, the amount could not be taxed as unexplained money merely because it was received in cash and omitted from the sale deed. The capital gains computation had to be recomputed in each co-owner's hands according to their share.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
