Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Additional evidence bearing directly on the transfer pricing adjustment for interest on a loan to an associated enterprise was admitted, including the independent auditor's report, the RBI correspondence and order, and a Hamburg District Court liquidation order. As the subsidiary was stated to be incurring persistent losses and under liquidation, the existing 6% interest adjustment was held unsustainable without examining these materials. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing, and no final ruling on the merits of the adjustment was made.
Additional evidence bearing directly on the transfer pricing adjustment for interest on a loan to an associated enterprise was admitted, including the independent auditor's report, the RBI correspondence and order, and a Hamburg District Court liquidation order. As the subsidiary was stated to be incurring persistent losses and under liquidation, the existing 6% interest adjustment was held unsustainable without examining these materials. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing, and no final ruling on the merits of the adjustment was made.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.