Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing disputes resolved under the India-Japan MAP can be given effect only after the assessee withdraws the appeal ground covered by the resolution. Article 25 of the treaty was invoked for the transaction with Japanese associated enterprises, and the assessee stated that it would accept the competent authorities' resolution. Under Rule 44G, the Assessing Officer is to pass orders giving effect to the MAP resolution once the related appeal is withdrawn. The assessee accordingly requested withdrawal of the relevant ground, and the tax department raised no objection.
Transfer pricing disputes resolved under the India-Japan MAP can be given effect only after the assessee withdraws the appeal ground covered by the resolution. Article 25 of the treaty was invoked for the transaction with Japanese associated enterprises, and the assessee stated that it would accept the competent authorities' resolution. Under Rule 44G, the Assessing Officer is to pass orders giving effect to the MAP resolution once the related appeal is withdrawn. The assessee accordingly requested withdrawal of the relevant ground, and the tax department raised no objection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.