Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Transfer pricing disputes resolved under the India-Japan MAP can be given effect only after the assessee withdraws the appeal ground covered by the resolution. Article 25 of the treaty was invoked for the transaction with Japanese associated enterprises, and the assessee stated that it would accept the competent authorities' resolution. Under Rule 44G, the Assessing Officer is to pass orders giving effect to the MAP resolution once the related appeal is withdrawn. The assessee accordingly requested withdrawal of the relevant ground, and the tax department raised no objection.
Transfer pricing disputes resolved under the India-Japan MAP can be given effect only after the assessee withdraws the appeal ground covered by the resolution. Article 25 of the treaty was invoked for the transaction with Japanese associated enterprises, and the assessee stated that it would accept the competent authorities' resolution. Under Rule 44G, the Assessing Officer is to pass orders giving effect to the MAP resolution once the related appeal is withdrawn. The assessee accordingly requested withdrawal of the relevant ground, and the tax department raised no objection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.