Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Transfer pricing disputes resolved under the India-Japan MAP can be given effect only after the assessee withdraws the appeal ground covered by the resolution. Article 25 of the treaty was invoked for the transaction with Japanese associated enterprises, and the assessee stated that it would accept the competent authorities' resolution. Under Rule 44G, the Assessing Officer is to pass orders giving effect to the MAP resolution once the related appeal is withdrawn. The assessee accordingly requested withdrawal of the relevant ground, and the tax department raised no objection.
Transfer pricing disputes resolved under the India-Japan MAP can be given effect only after the assessee withdraws the appeal ground covered by the resolution. Article 25 of the treaty was invoked for the transaction with Japanese associated enterprises, and the assessee stated that it would accept the competent authorities' resolution. Under Rule 44G, the Assessing Officer is to pass orders giving effect to the MAP resolution once the related appeal is withdrawn. The assessee accordingly requested withdrawal of the relevant ground, and the tax department raised no objection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
